Bring back PD 3.0
This commit is contained in:
@@ -188,15 +188,15 @@ PolicyEngine::policy_engine_state PolicyEngine::pe_sink_wait_cap() {
|
||||
&& PD_NUMOBJ_GET(&tempMessage) > 0) {
|
||||
/* First, determine what PD revision we're using */
|
||||
if ((hdr_template & PD_HDR_SPECREV) == PD_SPECREV_1_0) {
|
||||
// /* If the other end is using at least version 3.0, we'll
|
||||
// * use version 3.0. */
|
||||
// if ((tempMessage.hdr & PD_HDR_SPECREV) >= PD_SPECREV_3_0) {
|
||||
// hdr_template |= PD_SPECREV_3_0;
|
||||
// /* Otherwise, use 2.0. Don't worry about the 1.0 case
|
||||
// * because we don't have hardware for PD 1.0 signaling. */
|
||||
// } else {
|
||||
hdr_template |= PD_SPECREV_2_0;
|
||||
// }
|
||||
/* If the other end is using at least version 3.0, we'll
|
||||
* use version 3.0. */
|
||||
if ((tempMessage.hdr & PD_HDR_SPECREV) >= PD_SPECREV_3_0) {
|
||||
hdr_template |= PD_SPECREV_3_0;
|
||||
/* Otherwise, use 2.0. Don't worry about the 1.0 case
|
||||
* because we don't have hardware for PD 1.0 signaling. */
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
hdr_template |= PD_SPECREV_2_0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return PESinkEvalCap;
|
||||
/* If the message was a Soft_Reset, do the soft reset procedure */
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user