Dont need history compensation for delay
This commit is contained in:
@@ -76,11 +76,7 @@ uint32_t TipThermoModel::getTipInC(bool sampleNow) {
|
||||
// Power usage indicates that our tip temp is lower than our thermocouple temp.
|
||||
// I found a number that doesn't unbalance the existing PID, causing overshoot.
|
||||
// This could be tuned in concert with PID parameters...
|
||||
#ifdef THERMAL_MASS_OVERSHOOTS
|
||||
currentTipTempInC += x10WattHistory.average() / 25;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
currentTipTempInC -= x10WattHistory.average() / 25;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if (currentTipTempInC < 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return currentTipTempInC;
|
||||
@@ -93,7 +89,7 @@ uint32_t TipThermoModel::getTipInF(bool sampleNow) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
uint32_t TipThermoModel::getTipMaxInC() {
|
||||
uint32_t maximumTipTemp = TipThermoModel::convertTipRawADCToDegC(0x7FFF - (21 * 5)); // back off approx 5 deg c from ADC max
|
||||
uint32_t maximumTipTemp = TipThermoModel::convertTipRawADCToDegC(0x7FFF - (21 * 3)); // back off approx 5 deg c from ADC max
|
||||
maximumTipTemp += getHandleTemperature(0) / 10; // Add handle offset
|
||||
return maximumTipTemp - 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user